Free speech has once again become an enemy of the state. It’s under attack in most, if not all western countries. This isn’t the first time it’s been under attack (this year!) and it certainly won’t be the last. For years we have known that the UN despises free speech; they were some of the first to develop hate speech law while citing “human rights progress” as the reason for banning speech. Limiting rights is the way to create more rights. Freedom is slavery. Makes a lot of sense, doesn’t it?
Over the course of the last few years, there has been an increase of police raids in private homes, and it’s not because of guns, explosives, drugs, or dangerous behavior. These raids have taken place because someone said something on Facebook that their government didn’t like. In some cases from this year alone people’s houses were raided because they mentioned a bomber was muslim.
This year, Canadian Supreme Court stated that the truth is no excuse for hate speech. Whether we like each other or not, defending our rights to free speech from dictatorial control should be a cause that everyone can get behind, but somehow… it’s not. Increasingly leftists have been demanding lawmakers accept their definitions of hate speech and criminalize it. Increasingly leftists have demanded that anything that can be ‘interpreted’ as hurtful, mildly uncomfortable, or just negative be criminalized. Increasingly leftists have shifted from pretending to a party of liberation (freedom) to a party of dictatorial control to tell you what you can and can’t say, in an attempt to criminalize criticizing–Yes, there are actually people who want to criminalize criticism or being called a liar.
Anyone with any sense doesn’t use the term “hate speech” and really, only the insane or incredibly power-crazed want to take advantage of “hate speech” censorship laws. There’s a lot at stake when free speech is limited or completely taken away. By giving people the power to limit what is acceptable to talk about, you limit the conversation. By limiting the conversation, you limit knowledge and by limiting knowledge, you uneducate the masses and leave them vulnerable to mass control, dictatorships, fascism, and destruction.
It’s a beautiful thing, the Destruction of words. Of course the great wastage is in the verbs and adjectives, but there are hundreds of nouns that can be got rid of as well. It isn’t only the synonyms; there are also the antonyms. After all, what justification is there for a word, which is simply the opposite of some other word? A word contains its opposite in itself. Take ‘good,’ for instance. If you have a word like ‘good,’ what need is there for a word like ‘bad’? ‘Ungood’ will do just as well – better, because it’s an exact opposite, which the other is not. Or again, if you want a stronger version of ‘good,’ what sense is there in having a whole string of vague useless words like ‘excellent’ and ‘splendid’ and all the rest of them? ‘Plusgood’ covers the meaning or ‘doubleplusgood’ if you want something stronger still. Of course we use those forms already, but in the final version of Newspeak there’ll be nothing else. In the end the whole notion of goodness and badness will be covered by only six words – in reality, only one word. Don’t you see the beauty of that, Winston? It was B.B.’s idea originally, of course,” he added as an afterthought.
– 1984, George Orwell
We’re in the middle of a huge destabilization crisis. Some of our most powerful leaders are traitors to the state and they are actively trying to destroy what has been built in America. One of the ways to do this is by destroying law-abiding citizens and increasing crime. The elite are attempting to do this in the following ways:
- Punish Law-Abiding Citizens
This is most effectively seen through the push for gun control. There are millions of guns in the good hands of responsible gun owners all across the country, yet one in a million and people want to confiscate any form of firearm from law-abiding citizens.
A few months back there was a woman who shot a home intruder who had come to rob and attack her and her family; her children were incredibly young. She heard the intruder, grabbed her gun, and shot him on sight. He died, then his family and friends pushed for gun control because she was wrong to defend herself and her home. She should have allowed herself to be robbed, raped, and possible murdered–and other’s agree with this.
By creating laws, you are not removing guns from the hands of criminals. Look at how many criminals we have who are not allowed to legally own firearms, and yet police officers are constantly having gun battles with armed criminals who shouldn’t have firearms. By punishing law-abiding citizens by removing a constitutional right to defense, you weaken the country, you invite crime, and you destroy society. It is statistically proven that states with more relaxed gun laws see less crime than those with stricter gun laws.
- Criminalizing Non-Criminal Behavior
As mentioned above, the elite and fascist left are trying to criminalize thought crime and what they consider as hate speech. This started a few years back as the term ‘microaggression’ appeared in communities across the country. Micro, as in tiny, like germs you can’t see, and aggression is self explanatory. This term was coined specifically so unhappy individuals could feel justified in their attack against someone whom they disagree with. Microaggressions are called micro because you can’t see them–because they don’t exist, but fascists need some way to legally justify their physical responses and attacks so they do not get sued or jailed. We saw a lot of this during the early primary states of the US election. Trump supporters were being assaulted outside of Trump rallies, but it was considered “okay” by mainstream media because Trump supporters were deemed as hatefully microaggressing people by just going to Trump rallies.
When I was in Alaska I witnessed people who said just asking if Alaskans live in igloos is considered racially offensive and a microaggression rather than someone who knows nothing about a diverse, strange, far off state in their own country asking questions because they’re curious.
- Decriminalize & Reward Criminal Behaviors
New York has decided that the best way to preemptively stop criminals from partaking in criminal behavior is by paying them. This year they released a program to pay convicted criminals $10,000 to not commit crimes. This is effectively positive reinforcement, the best psychological training mechanism there is for teaching desired behavior. <Insert link> Meanwhile, law abiding citizens receive nothing.
But wait, there’s more:
Let’s talk about the democratic candidate Hillary Clinton and the Clinton Crime Syndicate. Earlier this year Clinton Cash, a movie based on biographical book, was released giving a brief history of the Clinton Foundation’s money laundering, fraud, and other criminal activities. During the DNC in July, Wikileaks released thousands of emails, many of which displayed the corruption of the DNC through pay-for-play, election fraud, lying, and intimidation.
Earlier this week Clinton’s campaign manager was questioned about Benghazi and the email’s used on an unauthorized server and he answered, “It’s a conspiracy. Gowdy said there was no case and they are pushing a no case.”
Correction: Gowdy said there was a case, however, he would have a hard time finding a prosecutor. During his initial speech on the subject months ago, he stated that if it were anyone else, they would be convicted right there. People have been convicted for doing what Hillary has done to a smaller degree. What this situation has actually told all of America (and the world) is that if you are a good enough criminal, the proof can be there, but you can get away with murder if you have the money and intimidating tactics. The situation with Hillary has told us that crime does pay and after all this, she is being held up as a model for young girls. “You can do anything,” is right, including getting away with murder.
Speaking of which, it’s not only Hillary Clinton who is excused from her criminal behaviors. Let’s talk about Charlotte, Ferguson, Milwaukee, and every other city that has been brought to its knees by the terrorist organization, “Black Lives Matter.” Last weekend Charlotte, NC was set on fire by 60% NON-Charlotte residents. Why? Because a black cop shot a black criminal in a black mayored city with a majority black justice system… but fuck white people. Over the past few years multiple cities have been looted and destroyed by ‘riots’ against white people. In many of these cities, the BLM terrorists focused on attacking whites, in recent nights, they included targeting white neighborhoods. In Milwaukee, the sister of the dead criminal blatantly told the group on one of the following nights, “Wait, let’s stop destroying our neighborhoods. Let’s go destroy white people’s neighborhoods!” These are deliberate acts of terrorism. These are hate crimes.
You’d think the military would be brought in, riot guards would stop the destruction of American cities, and yet, BLM is allowed to ‘express’ themselves through the destruction of local stores, homes, and monuments while everyone else suffers. They are breaking the law, breaking public and private property, but eh, it’s okay, just let the children express themselves.
You know what should be criminalized though?
The right to defend oneself.
Our government will not classify BLM as a terrorist organization after they have destroyed countless cities, threatened public structures and businesses, assaulted and intimidated individuals, and have broken the law, however, we have people pushing for the indictment of Donald Trump… for saying things they don’t like to hear.
I dunno about you, but when I was a kid, I learned this special little phrase, “Sticks and stones may break my bones but words can never hurt me.” Apparently now this phrase is more like, “Sticks and stones may break my bones, but calling me a liar on Twitter can put me into therapy for the rest of my life and give me ten different mental illnesses and cause me to have anxiety attacks which is all way, way worse now let me go blog about how much of a victim I am and I’ll post your name so people can attack you because neh.”
Offense is taken, not given. You choose to have hurt feelings. You choose to take things said from a stranger personally. You can’t do something wrong then get mad at someone for saying something because ‘it hurts you.’
Look, this blog post is about more than just the right to say things. This blog post is about the health of a nation; it’s about the health of a continent; it’s about our ability to continue conversation and to learn. Criminalizing free speech doesn’t end hateful behavior; it hides it and often makes it worse, but the worst thing criminalizing free speech does is it ends conversations. If we can’t talk about something, then we cannot educate ourselves or anyone else about it. A disagreement is still a conversation which means we can find a middle ground or we can agree to disagree. When something disappears from language, the conversation ends, and the thought is gone. If we don’t know what we’re missing, it’s really hard to find it to bring it back and this threatens progress, safety, understanding, and history.
Notice how many of these censorship groups not only want to stop people from saying things, but they want to stop people from learning things. History courses are being taught without history; mobs want to destroy structures; students at Ivy League schools protest learning about great authors, explorers, and leaders because they’ve decided they are ‘offensive’ rather than looking at what they had to say and what they can teach us, good and bad. When you reject reality and history, you build a society on delusion and falsehoods. Purpose disappears, thought disappears, reason disappears, goodness disappears, our abilities to create, innovate, express, and progress disappear. Think about what’s at risk if you support the silencing of anyone through law and discipline.
If you think they won’t come for you, take a step back and look at the bigger picture… and maybe read a book.
Obama and his clan are to try and pass the unlawful, unconstitutional ICANN which will give OUR internet, property of the American People, over to the United Nations. They will then be in complete control to censor whatever they want, silence whomever they want. Obama has already stated that Americans giving up freedoms is his end goal. The UN has already stated that it will be censoring Americans if it has control of our internet servers.
There are a handful of congressmen currently fighting against the implementation of ICANN. If you want your voice to be heard, to show your support for the defense of free speech and American independence, call your local congressmen about ICANN before its too late.